http://hal_obrien.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] hal-obrien.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] libertango 2009-05-01 09:29 am (UTC)

Following up on this, I've posted to the P-I's comment board, and sent email to the reporter.

*^*^*
"No injuries were reported and no part of the plane was on fire when it landed, Sea-Tac spokeswoman Terri-Ann Betancourt said.

"There was a report of fire," she said. "A lot of times when an engine blows out it will flame out. That's probably what people saw."


I was standing in the parking lot at the Federal Way Barnes & Noble. I was able to see the aircraft.

You could hear it before you saw it closely -- ba-da-DUM, ba-da-DUM. With each sound, one could see flames in the port engine, and on the third beat the flames would be in a long trail. It was almost like an old car backfiring. It did this multiple times.

Now, perhaps that was fuel in the engine igniting in a non-standard way, and thus the engine itself was not precisely "on fire."

But a "blowout" implies a single event. That does not match the cyclical set of events I observed.

I tried to use my cell phone's camera to take a picture, but against the 3PM sky there was too much glare for me to get the shot.

After it passed overhead heading southerly, I saw it do a banked turn towards the west. This would match the reports of the turn taking place just before Tacoma. I also noticed the booms stopped. I kept an eye for a while on the western horizon for any smoke, as I feared the airplane had lost power and augured in.

I'm glad that fear was without merit. But this story does not match what I saw and heard.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting