libertango: (Default)
Hal ([personal profile] libertango) wrote2010-01-11 08:14 am

Adventures in Copyediting

"Air Canada told to provide nut-free zone."

Sounds like a potentially popular feature to me. I think the world in general could use one or two of those.

Even better is the lead 'graph:

"Airline must provide a special ‘buffer zone' on aircraft for people who are allergic to nuts, transportation agency rules."

I'm allergic to nuts! Well, almost. I can haz "special buffer zone," plz?

EDITED TO ADD: Y'all are aware that while the original piece was referring to nuts-as-food, I'm referring to the possible misread of nuts-as-crazy-people, yes? That's why it's "Adventures in Copyediting," and not, "Adventures in Special Diets." Hence why the idea of a "nut-free zone" might be amusing...

[identity profile] randy-byers.livejournal.com 2010-01-11 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I initially read that as "All Canada told to provide nut-free zone." My thought was that they already *were* that, at least compared to their southern neighbor.

[identity profile] supergee.livejournal.com 2010-01-11 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Just recently an airline passenger tried to make himself a nut-free zone.

[identity profile] metalmensch.livejournal.com 2010-01-11 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Aah. Another reason to dislike Air Canada. I'll bet that will raise their already pretty shitty ticket prices even higher.

[identity profile] n6tqs.livejournal.com 2010-01-11 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I've wondered about that, since one of my staples for long, multi-leg flights is trail mix, with lots of nuts; what happens if I get seated next to one of someone who objects (with good reason, granted) to my eating my own food?