One More Thing...
Sep. 15th, 2006 04:30 pmI want to make another point about this whole episode. I didn't want to while saying what I thought needed to be said, because I didn't want to be accused of making this issue about me.
Let's look at the original post by
fimbrethil, telling us she'd learned of my mistake:
"I am absolutely livid right now. I was pointed to a post else journal where someone, posting about 9/11, wrote that
rosefox lost a husband as a result of 9/11. No, she didn't. She lost an LDR partner."
(emphasis added by me)
The crucial thing here, to me, is this:
Whoever pointed
fimbrethil to my post did not take it up with me first. If they had, it would have taken no more than literally ten minutes to resolve. My words are not so precious to me that I wouldn't have made friendly amendments. Had I been contacted directly, the necessary corrections would have been made swiftly, and there would have been substantially less pain and distress all around. My first and foremost commitment is to the truth.
Perhaps I'm indulging in 20/20 hindsight when I say I think
fimbrethil's reaction to the news was completely predictable -- but I don't think so.
To sum briefly:
There were two ways to resolve this -- a kind way, and a cruel way.
You, whoever-you-are, chose the cruel way.
Those were the choices you had.
Those were the choices you made.
Don't think you escaped being noticed.
*^*^*
I don't know who you are. I know this LJ is read by many people beyond those on my friends' list.
My point is, like the quote from Aaron Sorkin on my profile, "Well, God, Jed, I don't even want to know you."
You've caused enough pain and distress as is. Try to take "credit," and I'll delete the comment, and ban you.
If you're of a Judeo-Christian bent, you might want to ponder Exodus 22:22-24 for a while. Like I said at the time, "As someone who lost a father when he was seven, it's the children left behind for whom I grieve the most." (And, that said, all my heart goes out to Brigid, Liam & Elle's daughter.)
I've said my piece.
Let's look at the original post by
"I am absolutely livid right now. I was pointed to a post else journal where someone, posting about 9/11, wrote that
(emphasis added by me)
The crucial thing here, to me, is this:
Whoever pointed
Perhaps I'm indulging in 20/20 hindsight when I say I think
To sum briefly:
There were two ways to resolve this -- a kind way, and a cruel way.
You, whoever-you-are, chose the cruel way.
Those were the choices you had.
Those were the choices you made.
Don't think you escaped being noticed.
*^*^*
I don't know who you are. I know this LJ is read by many people beyond those on my friends' list.
My point is, like the quote from Aaron Sorkin on my profile, "Well, God, Jed, I don't even want to know you."
You've caused enough pain and distress as is. Try to take "credit," and I'll delete the comment, and ban you.
If you're of a Judeo-Christian bent, you might want to ponder Exodus 22:22-24 for a while. Like I said at the time, "As someone who lost a father when he was seven, it's the children left behind for whom I grieve the most." (And, that said, all my heart goes out to Brigid, Liam & Elle's daughter.)
I've said my piece.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 12:23 am (UTC)Not sure I wrote this well
Date: 2006-09-16 12:27 am (UTC)No, my wrath is at whoever it was who felt both a) I couldn't be trusted to correct my posts if contacted directly, and b) A 9/11 widow needed to be dragged in, with the scab of whatever pre-existing fight between her and Rose picked at, to boot.
If distress is needful, that's unfortunate, but liveable. I'm angry at the amount of unnecessary distress in all this.
Yup.
Date: 2006-09-16 12:30 am (UTC)Which means whoever stirred this pot of worms, rather than contacting me directly so I could fix things quietly, may well have done so intentionally.
That's what I'm mad at.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 12:33 am (UTC)I thought the person you were apologising to was
I also didn't see why
It is now much more clear.
I'm sorry this went that way.
TK
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 12:37 am (UTC)Whoever pushed the drama by "pointing out" to someone else (as opposed to just letting you know the correct situation) what was obviously a miscommunication error should be ashamed of themselves. Unfortunately, they probably arent.
And we thought these kind of things ended in high school...
In the end, maybe everyone takes LiveJournal-land a little too seriously.
B
Re: Not sure I wrote this well
Date: 2006-09-16 01:19 am (UTC)Re: Not sure I wrote this well
Date: 2006-09-16 01:27 am (UTC)As far as I can glean about you in print and in the handful of face-to-face interactions we've had, you're a kind person...kind people bleed a lot when they think they've inadvertently hurt someone else. But it really does look like you did everything you needed to do to clear up your part in the miscommunication.
And I'll shut up now, in case I'm continuing to misunderstand what's going on. My brain is sort of foggy today and it's entirely possible that I'm making zero sense.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 02:10 am (UTC)Well...
Date: 2006-09-16 02:17 am (UTC)But, hey... When my leg was broken, and I was getting around on crutches and a wheelchair, I found myself very much in favor of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), too. (One example: Washington's freeway rest areas have electric dryers that are on the opposite wall from the sinks in the rest rooms. That meant I had to use my sopping --and slippery -- hands on my crutches to get my hands dry. Grrrr...)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-16 02:28 am (UTC)Re: Not sure I wrote this well
Date: 2006-09-16 11:37 am (UTC)Yes, that exactly.
Here's what happened.
Date: 2006-09-16 11:42 am (UTC)And thank you for adding me to your list. I have added you back.
Re: Here's what happened.
Date: 2006-09-16 11:46 am (UTC)Re: Not sure I wrote this well
Date: 2006-09-16 02:25 pm (UTC)Re: Not sure I wrote this well
Date: 2006-09-16 08:53 pm (UTC)--s