Hunting the wild quote
Jan. 28th, 2009 09:58 amKottke pointed to this listing of the "50 Most Loathsome People In America 2008".
Clocking in at #30, our old friend, Antonin Scalia. OK, no big surprise that the most intellectually dishonest person in DC should make such a list. But why in this case?
"Exhibit A: “Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached.”"
Huh. The spooky thing is, while I can see Nino saying such a thing, I'd think I would've heard of that by now. So you know what I had to do.
A quick Google search yielded 12,200 results. On the first batch of hits, we see a citation: Herrera v. Collins 506 US 390 1993.
Alas... Here's Scalia's concurrence in Herrera v. Collins. No such quote appears. That's the good news.
The bad news? It's not an unfair paraphrase of what he did say. Which means I suspect this internet hoax started as someone being snarky about the opinion (I thought it might be Dahlia Lithwick, but it doesn't seem so), then the vital phrase along the lines of, "It's as if Scalia is saying..." disappeared, and it was just laid at Scalia's feet whole cloth.
Still. 12,000 hits on the misquote. Including at "quotation sites." (!)
So perhaps there's justice after all.
( Scalia's opinion is short enough I'll give the whole thing after the cut. )
Clocking in at #30, our old friend, Antonin Scalia. OK, no big surprise that the most intellectually dishonest person in DC should make such a list. But why in this case?
"Exhibit A: “Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached.”"
Huh. The spooky thing is, while I can see Nino saying such a thing, I'd think I would've heard of that by now. So you know what I had to do.
A quick Google search yielded 12,200 results. On the first batch of hits, we see a citation: Herrera v. Collins 506 US 390 1993.
Alas... Here's Scalia's concurrence in Herrera v. Collins. No such quote appears. That's the good news.
The bad news? It's not an unfair paraphrase of what he did say. Which means I suspect this internet hoax started as someone being snarky about the opinion (I thought it might be Dahlia Lithwick, but it doesn't seem so), then the vital phrase along the lines of, "It's as if Scalia is saying..." disappeared, and it was just laid at Scalia's feet whole cloth.
Still. 12,000 hits on the misquote. Including at "quotation sites." (!)
So perhaps there's justice after all.
( Scalia's opinion is short enough I'll give the whole thing after the cut. )