Great performance
Jul. 12th, 2005 10:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Jack also asks about the legal propriety of all this. I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that covers are governed by what's known as a compulsory license. That is, you don't have to get permission from the copyright holder to record a cover, you just have to pay a fixed royalty after the fact.
The big deal in musical copyrights, really, are performance licenses. That is, the right to, say, use a particular performance of a song in a movie. Use the Beatles' original recording of "My Guitar", and it'll probably cost an arm and a leg. Cover it yourself, and (I believe) you only have to pay the compulsory license fee. This is why, for example, Prince is re-recording his entire back catalog of records -- He wants to have a set of recordings he owns, rather than Warner Bros.
Again, I am not a lawyer, and this should not be regarded as advice of any sort, but just one person's understanding of the situation, which may well be flawed and need correction. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-13 05:12 pm (UTC)