![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Back from our road trip around the state of Washington.
Reading a good issue of The New Yorker, I came across the claim from John Colapinto that US retail business lost about $40 billion in 2006 from theft. Which sounds impressive, until one learns from the US Census Bureau that retail sales, total (excl. motor vehicle and parts dealers) for 2006 (NB: Adobe .PDF file) was very close to $3 trillion. So theft accounts for an amount only 1.34% of US retail sales, which is probably within the margin of error of their accounting practices.
Bottom line: They have no idea how much theft is actually taking place. It's not enough to measure accurately.
Reading a good issue of The New Yorker, I came across the claim from John Colapinto that US retail business lost about $40 billion in 2006 from theft. Which sounds impressive, until one learns from the US Census Bureau that retail sales, total (excl. motor vehicle and parts dealers) for 2006 (NB: Adobe .PDF file) was very close to $3 trillion. So theft accounts for an amount only 1.34% of US retail sales, which is probably within the margin of error of their accounting practices.
Bottom line: They have no idea how much theft is actually taking place. It's not enough to measure accurately.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 09:15 am (UTC)Not necessarily. In some market segments (like C-stores), shrink can be a signifigantly higher percentage, measurable with arbitrary accuracy. The real barrier is fear of revealing proprietary information and looking bad in general (or too good to certain people).
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 10:53 pm (UTC)For those following along at home, that appears to be short for "convenience stores" (given a Google ratio of 200K to 12 million hits, a reader might not know that).
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 12:16 am (UTC)