The stupid, it burns

[libertango]

sneerpout just used Facebook to point to this article, claiming in its title, "Sprechen Sie lazy? Why the actors in The Reader should have learnt German"

The response I just posted:

*^*^*

Mr. Gilbey in this article shows a contempt for imagination that is quite strange for an arts critic. To imagine that no one English or American can have any possible idea what a German feels or thinks is the sort of prejudice and dehumanization of the "other" that leads to wars. If one believes in art, one believes in human universals, regardless of language.

I'm reminded of the story of Laurence Olivier observing Dustin Hoffman's "method" acting technique of not sleeping and making a mess of himself to get into character while shooting Marathon Man. Olivier's comment? "Dear boy, it's called acting."

But then, Olivier was also playing a German in that movie. So I suppose Mr. Gilbey wouldn't have approved from the start.

Or... Oh, is this the "irony" I've heard so much about from my British friends, and Mr. Gilbey's piece itself isn't meant to be taken literally? No American truly understands irony, after all. All my British friends tell me so.

Comments

[replyhazy.livejournal.com]

This reminds me of a friend who watched the Bela Lugosi "Dracula" first in English, then in Spanish (which he was fluent in) in order to compare them, just out of curiosity. He said that the flavor of some of the lines was quite different, but that if you had nothing to compare it to, you'd never notice.

I think it's a bit like those of us who know a book or a graphic novel quite well, then see the movie version and complain about it -- no, it's not the same. To expect it to be just the same is dumb. While I suppose a German-language, German-acted version of The Reader might indeed be quite good, that doesn't mean the English version is bad; just not the same.

What a whiny old sourpuss that writer is.